Getting My case law on disciplinary proceedings To Work

Since the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

The main objectives of police is to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and previously mentioned all make certain law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents from the boy or Lady tend not to approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they will do if they will Slash off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by law.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed towards the disposal of the instant petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner as well as private respondents and will just take care of every one of the components of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

The proposal is apparently reasonable and acceded to. Inside the meantime police shall remain neutral from the private dispute between the parties, however, if any of the individuals is indulged in criminal activity the police shall take prompt action against them under law. 5. The moment petition is disposed of in the above terms. Read more

While in the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court could be the highest court while in the United States. Reduced courts on the federal level consist of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related for the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every state has its own judicial system that features trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Every state is often referred to since the “supreme” court, Whilst there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or maybe the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, Whilst state courts may additionally generally listen to cases involving federal laws.

We are an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of regulation and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed because of the Constitution and laws on the United States and this State.

ten. Without touching the merits from the case of your issue of annual increases during the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, these kinds of once-a-year increase, if permissible within the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment to generally be made through the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance resulting from funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more

Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination within the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity from the spend scale allowances of Stenographers from the District Judiciary is inside the crystal clear negation of your regulation laid down via the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Read more

Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated previously mentioned. However no harassment shall be caused to either party as well as case shall be decided from the competent court of law if pending. Read more

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar difficulty. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in implementing the get more info law. This example of case law refers to two cases listened to from the state court, with the same level.

Because of their position between the two main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of legislation.

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance to your party’s argument, or to guide the present court.